<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflections on Elections</title>
	<link>http://www.webboise.com/reflections-on-elections/</link>
	<description>Chris Hillman's random rants on IT stuff &#038; life</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  7 Feb 2012 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: carol</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/reflections-on-elections/#comment-30248</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 04:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/reflections-on-elections/#comment-30248</guid>
					<description>Like RH said .... How can you believe in “small government, low taxes, fiscal responsibility, individual freedoms, and state’s rights.”, but then turn around and vote for ...  Obama?  

He spent MORE IN HIS FIRST 100 DAYS IN OFFICE than ALL the previous presidents combined.  Going clear back to George W!  Covering World War I and II, the Korean War, War of 1812, the War for Independance, the Civil War, the Viet Naum War, and the recent Iraq War that the Dems keep pouting about.  
But, even if there WEREN'T WMD, we STILL needed to get the CREEP out of power.  What he was doing was wrong -- right?  Clinton should have taken care of him when he bombed our servicemen.  But, no, not a Dem.  Leave it to a Rep to Kick Ass and Take Names....but Congress has to make the vote!  And make excuses later ... for years, and years!

One question about Obama... when is he going to Man UP and take responsibility for ANYTHING?  The oil spill that happened on his watch ... he handled so poorly -- poured chems into the Gulf faster than the oil was spilling in.  And took more vacations than you could shake a stick at.
And give money to the banks to 'bail them out' ... but without any oversight or cavet as to how they spend it -- no big payouts to the top guys should have been allowed, right?  But, no, Obama never takes any responsibility for anything.
Even when he sticks his foot in his mouth, like with the cop and the college prof situation.  Since the prof was black, he had to be in the right, right?  But, when inviting people to the WH afterwards, why not invite the female that phoned it in?  Isn't he supposed to be aware that women are REAL people?  Evidently She didn't want to go, anyway!  I sure wouldn't.
I didn't even go try to look at the fancy WHI plane when it was at the IF airport when Clinton was in office.  I was scolded -- told I should respect the office.  I respect the office.  Can't always respect the man IN the office. 
 Clinton seems to be a better EX pres than a pres!  Go figure!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like RH said &#8230;. How can you believe in “small government, low taxes, fiscal responsibility, individual freedoms, and state’s rights.”, but then turn around and vote for &#8230;  Obama?  </p>
<p>He spent MORE IN HIS FIRST 100 DAYS IN OFFICE than ALL the previous presidents combined.  Going clear back to George W!  Covering World War I and II, the Korean War, War of 1812, the War for Independance, the Civil War, the Viet Naum War, and the recent Iraq War that the Dems keep pouting about.<br />
But, even if there WEREN&#8217;T WMD, we STILL needed to get the CREEP out of power.  What he was doing was wrong &#8212; right?  Clinton should have taken care of him when he bombed our servicemen.  But, no, not a Dem.  Leave it to a Rep to Kick Ass and Take Names&#8230;.but Congress has to make the vote!  And make excuses later &#8230; for years, and years!</p>
<p>One question about Obama&#8230; when is he going to Man UP and take responsibility for ANYTHING?  The oil spill that happened on his watch &#8230; he handled so poorly &#8212; poured chems into the Gulf faster than the oil was spilling in.  And took more vacations than you could shake a stick at.<br />
And give money to the banks to &#8216;bail them out&#8217; &#8230; but without any oversight or cavet as to how they spend it &#8212; no big payouts to the top guys should have been allowed, right?  But, no, Obama never takes any responsibility for anything.<br />
Even when he sticks his foot in his mouth, like with the cop and the college prof situation.  Since the prof was black, he had to be in the right, right?  But, when inviting people to the WH afterwards, why not invite the female that phoned it in?  Isn&#8217;t he supposed to be aware that women are REAL people?  Evidently She didn&#8217;t want to go, anyway!  I sure wouldn&#8217;t.<br />
I didn&#8217;t even go try to look at the fancy WHI plane when it was at the IF airport when Clinton was in office.  I was scolded &#8212; told I should respect the office.  I respect the office.  Can&#8217;t always respect the man IN the office.<br />
 Clinton seems to be a better EX pres than a pres!  Go figure!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RH</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/reflections-on-elections/#comment-7506</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/reflections-on-elections/#comment-7506</guid>
					<description>How can you believe in "small government, low taxes, fiscal responsibility, individual freedoms, and state’s rights.", but then turn around and vote for Nader, then Kerry, then Obama? Your beliefs, and the candidates you vote for cancel each other out.  In the next 4-8 years, look forward to bigger government, higher taxes, fiscal irresponsibility, and fewer individual freedoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you believe in &#8220;small government, low taxes, fiscal responsibility, individual freedoms, and state’s rights.&#8221;, but then turn around and vote for Nader, then Kerry, then Obama? Your beliefs, and the candidates you vote for cancel each other out.  In the next 4-8 years, look forward to bigger government, higher taxes, fiscal irresponsibility, and fewer individual freedoms.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

