<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Crumpled Thoughts</title>
	<link>http://www.webboise.com</link>
	<description>Chris Hillman's random rants on IT stuff &#038; life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  9 Sep 2010 20:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Qwest DSL is better than CableOne for an ISP (for now) by Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-29070</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-29070</guid>
					<description>Your post is a bit old now, but September 2010 in part of Boise we live in the best Qwest speed available is 5Mbps, and costs, well, this is clearly a compromise rate since they don't advertise it, and they're playing pricing games... but I think with modem and such would end up running $43 a month. We have CableOne, which is 5Mbps, and is $43 a month. Qwest rightly notes in their pricing documentation that real speeds may be up to 15% slower, and CableOne is more stable but with the evening 50% slowdown after a certain quantity.

Neither option in Boise is cost effective or great compared to what's available in bigger cities. But with CableOne since 2002 I've had maybe 3 days their-fault downtime that I can recall (and then various storm outages which wreak havoc on any network.) I've called tech support when it was my-fault a couple times and they were not rude. No complaints here.

Found your page when I was looking up what the rate cap actually was for a defect I was filing against a product designed in a city where they laugh at the up speeds we have out here in the "sticks." Wait until I tell them the best my Idahoan parents can get for any price is 40kbps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post is a bit old now, but September 2010 in part of Boise we live in the best Qwest speed available is 5Mbps, and costs, well, this is clearly a compromise rate since they don&#8217;t advertise it, and they&#8217;re playing pricing games&#8230; but I think with modem and such would end up running $43 a month. We have CableOne, which is 5Mbps, and is $43 a month. Qwest rightly notes in their pricing documentation that real speeds may be up to 15% slower, and CableOne is more stable but with the evening 50% slowdown after a certain quantity.</p>
<p>Neither option in Boise is cost effective or great compared to what&#8217;s available in bigger cities. But with CableOne since 2002 I&#8217;ve had maybe 3 days their-fault downtime that I can recall (and then various storm outages which wreak havoc on any network.) I&#8217;ve called tech support when it was my-fault a couple times and they were not rude. No complaints here.</p>
<p>Found your page when I was looking up what the rate cap actually was for a defect I was filing against a product designed in a city where they laugh at the up speeds we have out here in the &#8220;sticks.&#8221; Wait until I tell them the best my Idahoan parents can get for any price is 40kbps.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Qwest DSL is better than CableOne for an ISP (for now) by TurbineSeaplane</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-26338</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-26338</guid>
					<description>+1 to the list of CableOne dumpers.

I've got Qwest starting on Monday.

I work in film production and I routinely need to upload and download large clips to off site servers, and the caps are simply ridiculous.

I've explained my needs to CableOne and their response was "can you set up the transfers for the AM hours"?

Yeah.  That's practical.  Screw you CableOne.  C'est La Vie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 to the list of CableOne dumpers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got Qwest starting on Monday.</p>
<p>I work in film production and I routinely need to upload and download large clips to off site servers, and the caps are simply ridiculous.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve explained my needs to CableOne and their response was &#8220;can you set up the transfers for the AM hours&#8221;?</p>
<p>Yeah.  That&#8217;s practical.  Screw you CableOne.  C&#8217;est La Vie.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Qwest DSL is better than CableOne for an ISP (for now) by Not Cab</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-25821</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 05:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-25821</guid>
					<description>They can't eat all the bandwidth in the area!  Unless, of course, the ISP oversells.  If someone pays for 20Mbps, they have paid for the use of it.  That's it.  No "hey, we didn't sell that to you!"  Yes, you did.  Provide the service which is being paid for.

It's not unacceptable to do computer security work, is it?  I constantly have to remove viruses from clients' websites at odd hours.  Unfortunately the tapping thing causes problems with that - it'll shut their website off so I can't fix it.  The tapping is also annoying because it is used to log information that should be confidential - for example, passwords, credit card numbers, etc.  Sure, they say "that information is kept safe..."  But that's not often the case - people hack into insurance companies, internet service providers, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can&#8217;t eat all the bandwidth in the area!  Unless, of course, the ISP oversells.  If someone pays for 20Mbps, they have paid for the use of it.  That&#8217;s it.  No &#8220;hey, we didn&#8217;t sell that to you!&#8221;  Yes, you did.  Provide the service which is being paid for.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not unacceptable to do computer security work, is it?  I constantly have to remove viruses from clients&#8217; websites at odd hours.  Unfortunately the tapping thing causes problems with that - it&#8217;ll shut their website off so I can&#8217;t fix it.  The tapping is also annoying because it is used to log information that should be confidential - for example, passwords, credit card numbers, etc.  Sure, they say &#8220;that information is kept safe&#8230;&#8221;  But that&#8217;s not often the case - people hack into insurance companies, internet service providers, etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Qwest DSL is better than CableOne for an ISP (for now) by Cab</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-25452</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 01:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-25452</guid>
					<description>if cable one didnt tap speed then one person would eat up all the bandwidth in the area and other people wouldnt get it. what if some one was using all the bandwidth in you area and all you wanted to do was play WoW or somthing simple and you couldnt.

They monitor the web sites for security and legal protection. there isnt some guy at a screen watching everything you go to, a system has loaded all of the illegal sites ex: child pornography, movie downloading, illegal file sharing. when a COMPUTER sees one of these sites it gets brought to attention and a COMPUTER puts a hold on the accnt until this is reconciled. this is only UNACCEPTABLE to people who love to break the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if cable one didnt tap speed then one person would eat up all the bandwidth in the area and other people wouldnt get it. what if some one was using all the bandwidth in you area and all you wanted to do was play WoW or somthing simple and you couldnt.</p>
<p>They monitor the web sites for security and legal protection. there isnt some guy at a screen watching everything you go to, a system has loaded all of the illegal sites ex: child pornography, movie downloading, illegal file sharing. when a COMPUTER sees one of these sites it gets brought to attention and a COMPUTER puts a hold on the accnt until this is reconciled. this is only UNACCEPTABLE to people who love to break the law.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Persistent IP Routes in Mac OS X Tiger by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/persistent-ip-routes-in-mac-os-x-tiger/#comment-24995</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/persistent-ip-routes-in-mac-os-x-tiger/#comment-24995</guid>
					<description>Thank you so much for this info.  Worked great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this info.  Worked great.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows PowerShell script for adding IP routes across a VPN by SkullKiller</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/windows-powershell-script-for-adding-ip-routes-across-a-vpn/#comment-24098</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/windows-powershell-script-for-adding-ip-routes-across-a-vpn/#comment-24098</guid>
					<description>Hi.

Here is a ps1 script that takes the interface name, the ip to route and the ipmask and routes an ip trough a interface. It can be a vpn or a normal network card. It utilizes route.exe for route adding and .net for NIC IP determination. It also deletes a route.

param(
        [string] $InterfaceName = "Grupo Visabeira",
        [string] $IP2Route = "192.168.3.138",
        [string] $IPMask = "255.255.255.255",
        [SWITCH] $Delete)
#$delete = $true
IF ($Delete){
    $local:res = route delete $IP2Route
    IF ($local:res -match 'OK!'){"Route $IP2Route Deleted"}
    ELSE{"Error Deleting $IP2Route: $local:res"}
}else{
    [reflection.assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("System.Net") &#124; Out-Null
    $local:nic = [system.net.networkinformation.networkinterface]::GetAllNetworkInterfaces()&#124;Where-Object {$_.name -eq $InterfaceName}
    if ($local:nic.OperationalStatus -eq 'Up') {
        $local:interfaceIP = ($local:nic.GetIPProperties().unicastaddresses&#124;where {$_.ipv4Mask -ne '0.0.0.0'}).Address.IPAddressToString
        if ($local:interfaceIP) {
            $local:res = route add $IP2Route MASK $IPMask $interfaceIP
            IF ($local:res -match 'OK!'){"Interface [$InterfaceName] Connected and Route $IP2Route Added"}
            ELSE{"Error Adding $IP2Route in Interface $InterfaceName : $local:err"}
        }
    }else{"Network Interface [$InterfaceName] Not Connected"}
}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p>
<p>Here is a ps1 script that takes the interface name, the ip to route and the ipmask and routes an ip trough a interface. It can be a vpn or a normal network card. It utilizes route.exe for route adding and .net for NIC IP determination. It also deletes a route.</p>
<p>param(<br />
        [string] $InterfaceName = &#8220;Grupo Visabeira&#8221;,<br />
        [string] $IP2Route = &#8220;192.168.3.138&#8243;,<br />
        [string] $IPMask = &#8220;255.255.255.255&#8243;,<br />
        [SWITCH] $Delete)<br />
#$delete = $true<br />
IF ($Delete){<br />
    $local:res = route delete $IP2Route<br />
    IF ($local:res -match &#8216;OK!&#8217;){&#8221;Route $IP2Route Deleted&#8221;}<br />
    ELSE{&#8221;Error Deleting $IP2Route: $local:res&#8221;}<br />
}else{<br />
    [reflection.assembly]::LoadWithPartialName(&#8221;System.Net&#8221;) | Out-Null<br />
    $local:nic = [system.net.networkinformation.networkinterface]::GetAllNetworkInterfaces()|Where-Object {$_.name -eq $InterfaceName}<br />
    if ($local:nic.OperationalStatus -eq &#8216;Up&#8217;) {<br />
        $local:interfaceIP = ($local:nic.GetIPProperties().unicastaddresses|where {$_.ipv4Mask -ne &#8216;0.0.0.0&#8242;}).Address.IPAddressToString<br />
        if ($local:interfaceIP) {<br />
            $local:res = route add $IP2Route MASK $IPMask $interfaceIP<br />
            IF ($local:res -match &#8216;OK!&#8217;){&#8221;Interface [$InterfaceName] Connected and Route $IP2Route Added&#8221;}<br />
            ELSE{&#8221;Error Adding $IP2Route in Interface $InterfaceName : $local:err&#8221;}<br />
        }<br />
    }else{&#8221;Network Interface [$InterfaceName] Not Connected&#8221;}<br />
}
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My PHP Powerball Picker by Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/my-php-powerball-picker/#comment-23252</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/my-php-powerball-picker/#comment-23252</guid>
					<description>i like you chirs powerpicker however the powerball for white ball is 1-59 not 54...and red ball is 1-44.i like the picker however that needs to be correccted..i use is and won  small sum of money..got 3 white balls..:???:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like you chirs powerpicker however the powerball for white ball is 1-59 not 54&#8230;and red ball is 1-44.i like the picker however that needs to be correccted..i use is and won  small sum of money..got 3 white balls..:???:
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Qwest DSL is better than CableOne for an ISP (for now) by Cable One Hater</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-20836</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-20836</guid>
					<description>I typed Cable One versus Quest in Google and landed here. Why I typed that? Because I was extremely pissed of with this guys and looking for an alternative.

Here is my review about Cable One.

1. Their server is overloaded. I frequently get drops.
2. I do not even need to mention about their speed tapping policy, outrageous at best
3. They monitor the web sites that you visit. That is unacceptable.
4. Idaho Falls headquarter is filled with uneducated and rude folks.
5. And, many many more that I cannot recall right now.

What is the solution. Lucky, I made some research. I found cheaper service($35) with faster speed (12 Mpbs)  and no tapping. Since I was ready to spend $50 for 10 Mpbs, I am seriously considering to get 20 Mpbs for $55 from Quest.

If anybody out there considering Cable One, Here is my advice. " Stay away Cable One at all cost". Otherwise, you will be sorry for sure. that is my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I typed Cable One versus Quest in Google and landed here. Why I typed that? Because I was extremely pissed of with this guys and looking for an alternative.</p>
<p>Here is my review about Cable One.</p>
<p>1. Their server is overloaded. I frequently get drops.<br />
2. I do not even need to mention about their speed tapping policy, outrageous at best<br />
3. They monitor the web sites that you visit. That is unacceptable.<br />
4. Idaho Falls headquarter is filled with uneducated and rude folks.<br />
5. And, many many more that I cannot recall right now.</p>
<p>What is the solution. Lucky, I made some research. I found cheaper service($35) with faster speed (12 Mpbs)  and no tapping. Since I was ready to spend $50 for 10 Mpbs, I am seriously considering to get 20 Mpbs for $55 from Quest.</p>
<p>If anybody out there considering Cable One, Here is my advice. &#8221; Stay away Cable One at all cost&#8221;. Otherwise, you will be sorry for sure. that is my experience.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Qwest DSL is better than CableOne for an ISP (for now) by Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-19486</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-19486</guid>
					<description>Oh, and to add further insult to injury, when I called their so-called 24 hour 'customer care' line, I got an automated message stating 'The person you have called is not available. Exiting the system. Goodbye.' The lights are on, nobody's home, and I'm heading for greener pastures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and to add further insult to injury, when I called their so-called 24 hour &#8216;customer care&#8217; line, I got an automated message stating &#8216;The person you have called is not available. Exiting the system. Goodbye.&#8217; The lights are on, nobody&#8217;s home, and I&#8217;m heading for greener pastures.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Qwest DSL is better than CableOne for an ISP (for now) by Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-19485</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webboise.com/why-qwest-dsl-is-better-than-cableone-for-an-isp/#comment-19485</guid>
					<description>Well, this confirms what I already believed. I had to buy a new 360, as the disc drive on mine had gone caput. I had somewhere in the neighborhood of 4-5 gigs of DLC on my old one, and I downloaded it all at once, and I've been getting ~45KB/s down ever since. It hasn't reset yet, either. I downloaded it earlier today, and it's currently 3 AM and I'm still not getting it. And to add insult to injury, I now cannot connect to XBL. Gonna make the switch ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this confirms what I already believed. I had to buy a new 360, as the disc drive on mine had gone caput. I had somewhere in the neighborhood of 4-5 gigs of DLC on my old one, and I downloaded it all at once, and I&#8217;ve been getting ~45KB/s down ever since. It hasn&#8217;t reset yet, either. I downloaded it earlier today, and it&#8217;s currently 3 AM and I&#8217;m still not getting it. And to add insult to injury, I now cannot connect to XBL. Gonna make the switch ASAP.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
